Impact of the new definition of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease on detection of significant liver fibrosis in US adolescents.

Recently, an expert panel proposed diagnostic criteria for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in the pediatric population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of MAFLD among US adolescents and to investigate whether the new MAFLD definition is able to identify individuals with more advanced liver disease. We analyzed data from participants 12-18 years old included in the 2017-2020 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a large survey aimed at including individuals representative of the non-institutionalized general US population. Participants with a complete vibration-controlled transient elastography exam were included. Steatosis was evaluated through the median controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and fibrosis through median liver stiffness measurement (LSM). Recently proposed criteria for the diagnosis of MAFLD were applied. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of the new MAFLD definition on the odds of significant liver fibrosis. We included a total of 1446 adolescents (mean age: 14.9 years; 52.0% male; 47.3% overweight or obese). No participant reported a previous history of viral hepatitis. Steatosis (CAP ≥ 248 dB/m) was present in 25.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 23.3-28.9) of individuals, and among these, 87.7% met the MAFLD criteria. Only 22.9% of patients with steatosis had elevated alanine aminotransferase levels. Among participants with steatosis, prevalence of significant liver fibrosis (LSM ≥ 7.4 kPa) did not differ significantly according to whether they met MAFLD criteria (9.7% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.276). In the multivariable model, odds of significant fibrosis did not differ significantly between these two groups. MAFLD criteria are met by most US adolescents with elastographic evidence of steatosis. Nonetheless, these criteria do not appear to improve detection of subjects with more advanced liver disease. Further longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate whether metabolic dysfunction is associated with faster progression toward inflammation, fibrosis, and liver-related events.

Helmet CPAP to treat hypoxic pneumonia outside the ICU: an observational study during the COVID-19 outbreak.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory failure due to COVID-19 pneumonia is associated with high mortality and may overwhelm health care systems, due to the surge of patients requiring advanced respiratory support. Shortage of intensive care unit (ICU) beds required many patients to be treated outside the ICU despite severe gas exchange impairment. Helmet is an effective interface to provide continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) noninvasively. We report data about the usefulness of helmet CPAP during pandemic, either as treatment, a bridge to intubation or a rescue therapy for patients with care limitations (DNI). METHODS: In this observational study we collected data regarding patients failing standard oxygen therapy (i.e., non-rebreathing mask) due to COVID-19 pneumonia treated with a free flow helmet CPAP system. Patients' data were recorded before, at initiation of CPAP treatment and once a day, thereafter. CPAP failure was defined as a composite outcome of intubation or death. RESULTS: A total of 306 patients were included; 42% were deemed as DNI. Helmet CPAP treatment was successful in 69% of the full treatment and 28% of the DNI patients (P < 0.001). With helmet CPAP, PaO2/FiO2 ratio doubled from about 100 to 200 mmHg (P < 0.001); respiratory rate decreased from 28 [22-32] to 24 [20-29] breaths per minute, P < 0.001). C-reactive protein, time to oxygen mask failure, age, PaO2/FiO2 during CPAP, number of comorbidities were independently associated with CPAP failure. Helmet CPAP was maintained for 6 [3-9] days, almost continuously during the first two days. None of the full treatment patients died before intubation in the wards. CONCLUSIONS: Helmet CPAP treatment is feasible for several days outside the ICU, despite persistent impairment in gas exchange. It was used, without escalating to intubation, in the majority of full treatment patients after standard oxygen therapy failed. DNI patients could benefit from helmet CPAP as rescue therapy to improve survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04424992.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Autoimmune Hepatitis: A Lesson From Immunosuppressed Patients.

Chronic immunosuppression is associated with increased and more severe viral infections. However, little is known about the association between immunosuppression and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Our aim was to describe the clinical course of patients with immunosuppressed autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in Italy. Our study is a case series of patients with AIH treated with immunosuppression, who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in March 2020 during the outbreak of COVID-19. Ten patients from seven different hospitals in Italy were diagnosed with COVID-19 during the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in March 2020. Seven subjects were female (70%), and age ranged from 27 to 73 years. Before the onset of SARS-CoV-2 infection, all patients were taking immunosuppressive therapy for AIH, and eight of them were on biochemical remission. Two other patients had recent acute onset of their AIH, and consequently started high-dose steroids, as per induction protocol. All patients had a respiratory syndrome and a positive nasal swab for SARS-CoV-2. Five patients developed a computed tomography-confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia. Six subjects received a combination of antiretroviral and antimalarial drugs. In seven patients, the dosage of immunosuppressive medication was changed. Liver enzymes were repeated during SARS-CoV-2 infection in all hospitalized cases; they remained within the normal range in all cases, and improved in the two acute cases treated with high-dose steroids. The clinical outcome was comparable to the reported cases occurring in non-immunosuppressed subjects. Conclusion: Patients under immunosuppressive therapy for AIH developing COVID-19 show a disease course presumptively similar to that reported in the non-immunosuppressed population. These data might aid in medical decisions when dealing with SARS-CoV-2 infection in immunocompromised patients.